Purple+Group's+Argumentative+Essay

= Welcome to Your Group Wiki Homepage =

This is a wiki for Alyx's GWR3 class. This is the Purple Group's homepage.

DRAFT 2 -Click here to go to page 2 of your Wiki.

FINAL DRAFT-Click here and you will go to page 3 of your Wiki.

You can work together on this page to write, revise, & edit your argumentative essay. Alyx can also read your essay and give you suggestions!

To Type in Essay: 1) CLICK ON EDIT (-upper right.) 2) TYPE IN YOUR ESSAY (Follow the outline that Alyx has given you.) 3) CLICK ON SAVE (-right side on toolbar above.) = = =Introduction:=

Hook:


Connecting Information:
= =

=== In the recent years, many parents tend to let their children study online instead of learning face to face. It looks like a good idea, for it is very convenient for children to study at home. This education system, however, will make students lose something which they ought to learn. ===

Thesis Statement:


I think learning face to face is better than studying online because of three reasons. : learning cooperation, keeping motivation, and in-depth study.
=Body Paragraph 1:=

Topic Sentence (TS1=Reason 1):
 ===Face-to-face education helps students to learn cooperation with others. Working together is more difficult than we think it would be. === -Don't forget to mention the topic in the TSF2F is a better stystem than online learning because F2F helps students......

Learning friendship in class is helpful to connect to other people.
= = =Body Paragraph 2:=

Topic Sentence (TS2=Reason 2):
 ===Students can keep motivation for studying through the competition with their friends and encourage from teachers. === === -Don't forget to mention the topic in the TSF2F is a better stystem than online learning because F2F helps students stay motivated in their learning. ===

Why is this idea important?


Studying with friends and teachers in school makes students enthusiastic about their schoolwork.
=Body Paragraph 3:=

Counterargument:
===Opponents say that face-to-face education is very inefficient. .......Don't include this idea because it weakens your ideas by implying that F2F might be inefficient.....say something like...Opponents of F2F education feel that online learning may help the students because it may save students travel time to and from school. This point has some truth. Students would not have to travel to school and therefore they would save time. However, being at school helps the students have a more in-depth studying experience..... ===

Concession:
===This point has some truth. On-line education would be more efficient, and save more time. Again, delete this! It is too strong. ===

Refutation: (TS3=Reason 3)
 ===they can focus on the topics easier in class than online. -I'm not sure what this idea is related to....You need to begin your refutation with---However, (and then introduce your 3rd reason-in-depth study) ===

Explain Controlling Idea:
===<span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 10pt;">Face-to-face education leads student into in-depth study through contact with teacher, on the other hand, online education is able to turn their eyes away not lectures. ===

Why is this idea important?
<span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 10pt;">

<span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 10pt;">It is important to remember that the face-to-face education would help students to focus on learning.
= Conclusion: =

Revisit Hook:
===<span style="color: #ff0000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; line-height: 250%;">Have you ever used the internet when you study?Don't repeat the hook....Answer it"More and more students are learning online. Although the modern way of learning......" ===

Give a Final Thought:
=== A research shows that learning face to face can increase the effects of learning and improve the social ability to students.This is not a good place to introduce an idea related to researchresearch should be introduced in the INTRO or BODY paragraphs--This should be your final thought on the topic. ===